Friday, November 11, 2011



Generations of Captivity: A History of African-American 
Slaves
By: Ira Berlin 
"Slavery was ubiquitous--its marks-- need not be discussed to be understood.  A back disfigured by the lash, an ankle bruised by a shackle, a body seared by a branding iron were all silent reminders that slavery's history was none too distant" (Berlin, 235).  
Chapter 1: Charter Generations

17th century Old World Map
             “Black life on mainland North America originated not in Africa or America but in the nether world between the two continents. Along the periphery of the Atlantic- first in Africa, then Europe, and finally in the Americas- it was a product of the momentous meeting of Africans and Europeans and then their equally fateful rendezvous with the peoples of the New World. (Page 23)”
 Middle Passage

Atlantic creoles are a mixture of three continents surrounding the Atlantic Ocean. They are part of all three worlds combined and yet not really part of any. There peoples had heritage both European and African, they could have European dress and deportment. They are aware of local norms and were multilingualism. They had the knowledge of both communities but were not fully part of either society. 
       
New Netherlands
17th Century New Netherlands Map

The Dutch were in charge of shipping over to new world for a long time. Some Creoles were brought over as slaves others worked for company as free men like Jonges Tobias. Black people who came to New Netherland from 1620-1660 were able to integrate into society even though there were slaves.  Blacks made up over 30% of the population and were the major labor force of the colony.
Slaves could gain freedom at this point but it was very difficult; nearly impossible for privately owned. If the slave was owned by the West India Company which valued their slaves and would free elderly, but maintain ownership of their children.
Blacks in New Netherland were part of colonial life with Christianity, church functions like marriage and all other aspects of life.

The Chesapeake
17th Century Chesapeake Map 
In Chesapeake colony African/creoles were brought over to the new world and were the labor force. Anthony Johnson is an example of what happened in this colony for some blacks. Johnson married and had four children; he was allowed to farm his own land while working for his master. Johnson earned official commendation for hard labor and town service. Johnson was able to petition for relief when his farm burnt and received aid. Anthony Johnson even owned his own slaves. There were other Creoles types in the region that prospered in similar way to Johnson but there were also those who did not. 

Lower Mississippi Valley
17th Century Lower Mississippi Map
Creoles came over with masters and were brought to work and labor the land. Plantations did not flourish in Louisiana area, they did have government system and blacks used the law to their advantage like Samba Barbara.

Florida  
17th Century map of Spanish Florida
Spanish allied with slave in Florida because they saw slaves as an enemy to their enemy which made them a friend. Escaped slaves could come from Carolinas and into Florida where they could be paid to work, allowed to marry and provided everything that makes up freedom besides the actual title of being free. In 1693 Spanish went so far as to offer freedom to fugitives who converted to Catholicism. The Spanish did use the skills of Creoles and would enlist them in militia to attack Carolinas. Near Saint Augustine the governor of Florida established a black settlement that newly arrived slaves and free blacks would go to and be instructed by a priest to be converted to Catholicism. In Florida Creoles enjoyed far more full lives and freedom in society that anywhere else in new world at the time. 

Chapter 2: Plantation Generations 

“Their successors were not nearly as fortunate. They worked harder and died earlier. Their family life was truncated, and few men and women claimed ties of blood or marriage. They knew- and wanted to know-little about Christianity and European jurisprudence. (Page 53)”
The next generations of blacks in North America were not as fortunate as the charter generation. They worked really hard, died young, not as many got to neither marry nor bore children. They rarely owned property and little ever escaped slavery. They were thrown into the new world as slaves, denied most natural wants and needs of humans, and worked to death. 

Chesapeake and South colonies

A tidewater plantation, Virginia, circa 1750

Transition from society with slaves to a slave society came quickly. Indentured servants were changed to slaves. Plantations grew and the owners purchased slaves in large amounts, tobacco plantation owners purchased more than ever before. This cost the slaves more than ever. They died young, did straining work that left them mentally drained. In low country the slaves society came quicker than in Chesapeake because of the exportable stables like rice, indigo, rosin, etc. The planters started to choose slave types from where the blacks were coming from in Africa they preferred Gambian peoples and no Angolans which were known to run away. 

North Colonies

             In the Northern section of colonies there were not plantations that had slaves but there was a need for work force which they filled with slaves especially with war times that took away young white males. Owning slaves in the north was a way of showing wealth and prosperity. Slaves worked in master’s homes as well as in city shops. Life for slaves was hard because they were coming straight over from Africa without stop in West Indies. The north was cold, damp and full of diseases the Africans had never come in contact with and had no immunity to. This caused low reproduction rates and high death rates. There was also a huge amount of African men in colonies but not African women.
Slaves did form their own culture with things to celebrate like Pinkster days. They also designed homes like back in Africa and tried to maintain themselves with their heritage as much as masters who allow. 

Opinions on Charter and Plantation Generations

Slaves, Indentured servants and Masters

When first reading about the charter generations of slaves in the different colonies their lives seem like hard work and in general not what I would want for myself, but compared to plantation generation they are way better off. They have the ability to use the law on their side for things like land, relief, and when their property is stolen. They also have the chance of freedom, owning their own land and having a family. By far Creoles like Anthony Johnson had relatively good colonial life, he had wife and children and land. The problems that they faced were workloads, getting children and other blacks freedom, and that they were second class citizens.
The plantation generation was a lot worse off. The slaves were brought over in crowded ships. They were not taking Africans just from the coast but also from inland Africa and classifying the worth of the slaves based on their background. The slaves were brought over to new world with no strength after the long journey across the ocean. Then there was the auctioning and buying of the slaves, plantation owners would take them home and put them to work. They were exposed to new diseases that they had never been around which made them susceptible to them and many died. This was not a problem for the plantation owners who could easily go buy more and more slaves to fill their spots. These people were not treated like humans in any way; they were treated like dirt.
                  If I were to have to be back in that time period and was an African forced to go over to new world I would hope that I was a Creole that way I could know languages and laws of the cultures and be able to manipulate my way to having some freedoms and having land to take care of my family with. However, if I was a plantation slave I would just hope I died quick of a disease that was not too painful. 

 Chapter 3: Revolutionary Generations 


“The age of the great democratic revolutions—the American, the French, and the Haitian—marked a third transformation in the lives of black people in mainland North America, propelling some slaves to freedom and dooming others to nearly another century of captivity” (Berlin, 100).



Chapter three is intended to inform the reader of dramatic changes in slavery throughout all of the Americas as a result of the American Revolution leading into the cotton revolution. 

“The shock of revolution profoundly altered slavery…but slave-holders did not surrender their power easily.  In most places, they recovered their balance, sometimes overwhelming their opponents and sometimes acquiescing just enough to revitalize their shaken institution.  At the end of the revolutionary war there were many more black people enslaved than at the beginning” (Berlin, 100).

The author vividly paints the scenery through each territory and the form that slavery shapes due to revolution.

North

The events of the revolution attracted a “flood of fugitives [that became] difficult to stop and continued long after the fighting [had] stopped” (Berlin, 103).  Emancipation came quickly, but the demise of Slavery was slow in northern New England, and the free black population dramatically grew from several hundred to over 50,000 by 1810 (Berlin, 104).  “Emancipation did little to elevate the status of former slaves and, in many ways, weakened the place of black men and women in the northern economy” (Berlin, 107).  The majority of the migration went from country to urban living.  Although the free black people were no longer enslaved they were far from having equal freedoms to whites.  Poverty forced freed people to indenture themselves or their children to white households. 

“Slavery’s slow demise had powerful consequences for African-American life in the North.  “It handicapped efforts of black people to secure households of their own, to find independent employment and to establish their own institutions.  It gave former slave-owners time to construct new forms of subordination that prevented the integration of black people into free society as equals” such as, “curfews, travel restrictions, and denied the right to vote, sit on juries, testify in court and stand in the militia” (Berlin, 105).  No matter how restricted their freedom was, it was still viewed as freedom.

Free slaves took on new names, completely abandoning their African or slave roots, and changed their names to Christian names such as John or Sarah.  Slaves did not have surnames and many adopted ones such as, Freeman, and Newmans, reflecting their new status as free people.  Families worked hard to keep their families together, and even find members who had been placed elsewhere.  Most lived together in dwelling that held more than one family.

Adoption of the term “African” in the designation of African-American institutions marked the final creation of an African nationality in the New World…henceforth, all people of African decent in the United States would be one people” (111).

Chesapeake

“Chesapeake planters kept their holdings intact even as slavery collapsed in the states to the north… the nature of the war itself in the Upper South helped preserve slavery” (Berlin, 111, 112).  Progressive agriculture became the slaveholder’s agenda.  It included “new managerial techniques to rationalize production and increase the profitability of their estates…slave perspective was just the masters euphemism for working their slaves longer and harder” (Berlin, 115).  The internal slave trade, or Second Middle passage, proved to be a source of enormous profit to slave-owners in the Upper-South—what one Maryland newspaper called “an almost universal resource to raise money” (Berlin, 113).  Slaves were forcibly removed through apprenticeship, rental, and especially sale to the southern interior.  The number of families in which parents and children shared a residence declined among the revolutionary generation, and it became as an English visitor observed, the “usual practice for the Negroes to go to see their wives on Saturday night” (Berlin, 117).

Newly freed blacks faced heightened proscription, ostracism, and discrimination.  Much like the North new restrictions were made to ensure they did not receive equal status.  “Voting, sitting on juries, testifying in court, attending the militia, owning dogs, and carrying guns…a pass system prevented black men and women from traveling freely and required them to register annually with county authorities” (Berlin, 120-121).  In the territories the development of intense restrictions and increasing control of planters arises the further south one goes.  In order to live free blacks took jobs such as shoemaking, catering and a barber.  However, even though they worked they remained poor and propertyless.

Lowcountry South Carolina, Georgia and East Florida

“The War for Independence greatly disrupted plantation life, but the Patriot victory affirmed the power of the planter class and armed it with new weapons to protect and expand slavery” (Berlin, 123).

“Plantations became the killing grounds of the war, and their residents died by the thousands.  Nonetheless, amid the carnage, slaves began to make their lives anew on the old estates…death, flight and evacuation sharply reduced the slave population of the Lower South during the war years…before [planters] could begin rebuilding their shattered economy, reconstructing the labor force, and establishing new markets, planters had to restore order on their estates” (Berlin, 128). Planters and slaves came to agreements to allow slaves to participate in markets.  Markets allowed them to earn money to purchase food, and clothing that meant less money the slaveholder had to pay out for each slave.  However, overtime some planters became weary of the freedoms it gave slaves and restricted their involvement in ways such as plantation-based stores.  Others wanted to eliminate this privilege altogether resulting in friction between planter and slave. 

“In South Carolina and Georgia, where slaveholders maintained a firm grip on the levers of power, the Revolution remade slavery.  The prime element in the change was the emergence of cotton” (Berlin, 130). 

“The resumption of staple production kindled the demand for slaves, as slave masters hustled to replace the laborers lost during the war and add new ones…planters purchased many slaves from the North, where emancipation induced some slaveholders to sell off their slaves at bargain prices, and from the Upper South, where planters complained of excess of slaves and the appearance of “Georgia traders” initiated a massive forced migration.  The Second Middle Passage—the domestic slave trade—would eventually bring millions of slaves to the Lower South, but in its infancy it could not meet the swollen demand” (Berlin 130-131).  Thus reopening the Atlantic slave trade.  By 1808 another 90,000 African slaves were imported to South Carolina.  Large landholders purchased large estates from loyalists who moved on, as well as ousting small landholders. “The arrival of thousands of black newcomers –some from Africa, some from state to the north—complicated the struggle between master and slave” (Berlin, 133).

Just as free black people in the North and Lower South, free blacks of the South changed their names.  The major difference was the adoption of their previous owners surname.  The free population consisted mainly of Creole, women, children, and city dwellers.  Similar of the North and Upper South free black the free southern blacks continued to struggle with their freedoms partly because some “whites presumed them to be more black than free” (Berlin, 137).  Free blacks (Creoles) established societies that mirrored white societies.  The Brown Fellowship Society was open to Creoles, but not to black Africans.  The black African slaves in response opened their own societies.  “The transformation of black life in the Age of Revolution marked the emergence of a three-caste society in the Lower South” (Berlin, 140).   

Lower Mississippi


“With the end of the American Revolution, ambitious European and American planters and would-be planters flowed into the lower Mississippi Valley” (Berlin, 145).  To ensure slave loyalty and control slave-owners restricted slave mobility and denying them the right to hold or inherit property, contract independently, testify in court, gun ownership, reconstructed old slave codes and incorporated new provisions according to their territory.

In addition to cotton, specifically in Louisiana, planters invested in sugar production.  North of sugar country tobacco and indigo became a lucrative alternative (Berlin, 147).  “Sugar and cotton changed the face of the lower Mississippi alley, just as tobacco had earlier remade the Chesapeake and rice the low country…the boom of sugar and cotton increased the slave’ burden…planters imposed the order of slave society on the mainland’s oldest society with slaves, stretching the workday and adding new tasks to meet the unique demands of sugar and cotton” (Berlin, 147, 149).  

The demand for slaves increased dramatically, especially black African males who could endure the hardships of labor.  “Africanization marked the arrival of the plantation revolution in the lower Mississippi Valley…violent confrontations between masters and slaves seemed to grow as the lower Mississippi Valley became a slave society” (Berlin, 148, 149). 

Free people did managed to ignore the plights of the enslaved to ensure their safety and freedom was secure.  However, their lack of involvement did not prove them to be safe.  Whites imposed strict laws that limited their freedoms and in ways forced them to be subjugated to the whites. 

“As the Age of Revolution receded, the plantation revolution roared ahead, and with it the Second Middle Passage” (Berlin, 157).

Opinion:
I find it interesting how different each territory handled slavery before and after the Revolution.  Shockingly free slaves were restricted to the extremes of a slave.  They lived in poverty, and whites tried so hard to limit their ability to thrive and even live.  Most remained living with or in close proximity of their previous owners.  I imagine it was a sense of security, but if it were me, I would have packed up my family and ran West or somewhere that I wouldn’t have to be subjugated to a race who felt they were superior than myself, even though they claimed to live a Christ like life.  The mistreatment of humans is a tough subject to read let alone write.  Berlin does an exceptional and respectful job at describing the lives of slave-owners and slaves, but doesn’t go into the gory details of punishments and insurrections.  They are important part of understanding slave history, but I found the information he delivered produced a clear understanding of the development of post-revolutionary slavery that leads into the migration generations and civil war. 
 
Chapter 4: Migration Generations 



“Driven by the cotton and sugar revolutions in the southern interior, the massive deportation displaced more than a million men and women, dwarfing the transatlantic slave trade that had carried Africans to the mainland” (Berlin, 161).

“The Second Middle Passage was the central event in the lives of African-American people between the American Revolution and slavery’s final demise in December 1865” (Berlin, 161).

The purpose of Chapter 4 is to establish the understanding that slavery grew dramatically after the Revolutionary War.  The Second Middle Passage from the dramatic influx of slaves from Africa, free blacks being plucked from the streets in the North, to the selling or renting of slaves in other areas of the nation altered African-American society.  Tensions grew throughout the nation between slaveholders and anti-slavery supporters. 

The Southern Interior

“The Second Middle passage washed thousands of black men and women across the continent, expanding slavery westward” (Berlin 163). 

“Having seized the most fertile lands and prime river line locations, planters made the region safe for slavery by securing political power.  Without exception territorial governors were appointed from the ranks of the planter class or those who would soon enter the planter class, and slaveholders populated the territorial and state legislatures as well as the country courthouses and sheriff’s offices…upon entering the new territories, planters could be assured that their claim in property-in-persons would be protected, that their rights to discipline their slaves would be unchallenged, and that slaveholders and nonslaveholders alike would cooperate in the return of fugitives and the suppression of slave rebel” (Berlin, 165,166).  

The price of slaves rose quickly and in order to maintain and grow the need for slaves, slaveholders “depended upon smugglers, kidnappers, and traders to build their labor force” (Berlin 167).  Slaves and free blacks were informed through churches to be aware of the plight of kidnappers, and illegal slave sales.  In one instance the son of Isabella Van Wagenen was sold to Alabama.  With help from Quaker lawyers her son was retrieved (Berlin, 167). The ongoing threat of families being torn apart by the Second Middle Passage was terrifying.

“The sugar revolution paralleled the cotton revolution, as planters monopolized the best land, ousted smallholders, imported slaves in large numbers, and ratcheted up the level of exploitation” (Berlin, 179). Conditions on plantations were harsh for slaves, “few slaves lasted longer than seven years” (Berlin, 180).  Because of the drastic high mortality rate sugar planters relied on importation of new slaves (Berlin 181). The increased work from the demands of cotton production was hard on them.  Insurrections and rebellion arose in either severe instances, or minor sabotage increased the tensions between slaveholder and slave.  Masters punished their slaves severely for even the smallest infractions, trying to prove a point that it was unacceptable. 

“Whether they grew cotton or sugar, slaves transported to a strange land struggled to recapture the life they had once known.  Their lives were informed by a deep nostalgia for the world they had lost” (Berlin, 188).  Contact with family was hard to come by, and even those who were literate struggled and longed to know where there families were.  “The Second Middle Passage, like the first, dismantled families, but not the idea of family” (Berlin, 190). 

Slaves adopted Christianity and were encouraged to do so by their owners.  Some areas slave owners and slaves attended the same congregation, but the message of Exodus and other Christian values made it uncomfortable for slave owners, as did the election of black members of the clergy.  Slaves were then separated to meeting as only blacks, or slaves and monitored to ensure rebellions were not being planned. 

White women were scarce and many times men left their wives behind in the colonies to establish their plantations before moving their families.  “Slave women became plantation mistresses in both meanings of the word” (Berlin 182).  As plantations became stable, planters moved their wives and families out to live with them.  While some people turned their eyes away from the intermixed marriages, other opposed it.  One planter built a secret apartment in his mansion for his free black mistress and their children to live in.   

The Seaboard South

The Second Middle Passage extended west, but even further south in Georgia, Carolina’s, and Florida.  “the transformation of the seaboard South into a slave-exporting region, like the westward march of the cotton revolution, did not take place all at once” (Berlin, 213).  Slave owners relied on slave children as a profitable crop.  The fear of waking in the morning or going off to work and finding that your child, mother, father or other family had been sold was a constant strain on slaves. 

Communication between plantations moved quickly.  News of opposition to slavery, and the development of protests were a hot topic among slaves.  However, they had to be careful with how they shared information.  Many times meetings were held in secret.  Communities and support for the slave population for funerals, marriages, and aid were supported greatly by their established churches.  “In a world made turbulent and insecure by the second Middle Passage, such institutions offered a shelter strong enough to sustain its members and flexible enough to address the realities of sale.  Churches, schools, and associations—with their charters, regular meetings and membership rosters-- provided passports to community leadership, sites for debating the events of the day, and a means to mobilize slaves and free people of color” (Berlin, 230). 

“The massive torrent of the Second Middle Passage, which every year washed thousands of slaves southward, also spawned a small tributary that carried hundreds north” (Berlin, 230). 

North

The gradual emancipation laws were enacted in some northern states, such as New York, but in others were trying to revive it (Berlin, 231).  Even more limitations were forced upon free blacks.  In the North and South black people were excluded “from the rights that became identified with American citizenship” (Berlin, 231).  “Rather than “free states,” the post-emancipation from a society with slaves was still incomplete.  The protracted evolution from slavery to freedom was affirmed by the extraordinary slow growth of abolitionist sentiment” (Berlin, 233).  The separation of blacks and whites remained constant even in the north.  As Martin Delany, a free black said, “we are slaves in the midst of freedom” (Berlin, 234) blacks were not given the constitutional right of equal freedom that white males were entitled to.  However, blacks, both male and female, in the North did not fear standing up against slaveholders and proslavery.  “At every opportunity, they denounced slaveholders as the essence of evil and the social order of the plantation as an affront to the ideal American nationality” (Berlin, 240).  They extended their anti-slavery attacks even in the south.  The development of the Underground Railroad, safe houses, and freedom trails developed with the efforts of black and whites alike helping southern slaves escape. 

“By the 1850’s, few slaves did not know of the struggle between slave and free states or appreciate how that conflict might affect their future.  According to one planter, slaves followed the election of 1860 almost as closely as their owners, having “very generally got the idea of being emancipated when ‘Lincoln’ comes in” (Berlin, 244).  The hope for freedom started this historic time. 

Opinion:

I find it shocking that in the north free blacks were not bound by slavery they were still treated as such.  When we hear or think about the pre-Civil war era we think how the northerners are completely against slavery and want to give rights to blacks.  We are mistaken and do not understand the crucial imbalance that continued even with the emancipation laws being enacted in the North.  Southern planters were the strong, wealthy society that made it almost impossible to fight against.  Slaves endured an enormous amount of suffering and carried through the Civil War and even into the twentieth century.



 
First Generations: Women in Colonial America 
Carol Berkin 

Chapter 1: Immigrants to Paradise: White Women in the Seventeenth-Century Chesapeake


            The characteristics of Chesapeake society were quite unique in many senses. The Chesapeake region deviated from English social norms and for that reason many of the social institutions within the region were quite unstable, which led to relatively ambiguous gender roles for women in the Chesapeake (Berkin, 6).  With that being said in order to describe the union of man and woman in the Chesapeake one would begin to merely state that it was not only common, but rather the norm, for men and women to both marry more than once throughout their lifetime (Berkin, 5).  Possibly one of the reasons for the common occurrence second marriages was the fact that many women married extremely young within the region. And yet some men were considered fortunate to find a wife for the fact that the sex ratio of men to women was six to one, and yet still three to one as late as 1680 (Berkin, 6).
            Mortality rates within the Chesapeake appeared to be devastating. Women were especially susceptible to an early death due to vulnerability of bacterial diseases during pregnancy (Berkin, 7).  Men generally lived longer than women, something that has come to change now centuries later. As for pregnancy, women were generally pregnant every two years until they reached menopause or died (Berkin, 9).  And life expectancy for children was no greater than women, “forty-five percent of all white children born within the Chesapeake region died before their twentieth birthday” (Berkin, 6). 
            Different than that of English Society, Chesapeake households lacked the developed elements of housewifery, for they lacked churns and spinning wheels, and rudimentary tools, this made kitchen duties extremely difficult but more so time consuming.  Not only did women work in the kitchen, tending to household duties and raising the children, they also worked alongside their husbands in the fields, adding to a never ending supply of daily chores for the Chesapeake woman. “The tasks of childbearing and household and fieldwork were the primary physical and economic constraints in the life of a white Chesapeake woman”(Berkin, 13). 
            Ironically so, gossip was a fierce weapon amongst Chesapeake women, for the fact that they were left out of ‘large politics’ of government (Berkin, 11). It was quite often that women called each other ‘whores’,  defiling the names and reputations of young women. For this reason there was an intense need to protect ones reputation by making strictly calculated decisions and interactions with those from the opposite sex, so that in no way could a man or woman, question another  woman’s fidelity and loyalty to her husband (Berkin, 12).  Married women were much more susceptible to extreme consequences from a tarnished reputation due to accusations of promiscuity than that of a single woman for the fact that a married woman was dependent on her husband economically (Berkin, 12). 
          The most empowering role of women in Chesapeake society was that of the widow, for the fact that when a women’s husband died, she was then made responsible for matters that the said husband left behind, such as control over wealth and property; such assignments were not only limited but rather not permitted within the Chesapeake society in relation the roles of women (Berkin, 20).  

Opinion:

             At first glance women within the Chesapeake region appeared to resemble the modern day woman more so than that of other women living during colonial America.  This statement would appear true in relation to the various duties assigned to them such as house work, tending to the fields, or raising children, and taking care of the household.  But if one were to take a second look it all appears tiresome, and the characteristics which represent such a time period do not scream autonomy for women.  It appeared that there was an extreme paranoia for reputations due to sexual promiscuity, or rather the accusations of such, Something that is not as feared today with the embracement of women’s sexuality and feminist movements and organizations that have worked hard to eliminate the double standard that haunts our society in relation to men and women’s sexuality. Also today with the advance of medicine women are capable of not only having their babies but they are also surviving their pregnancies, in fact it is now abnormal for a woman to die after giving birth.

              The social status of a widow best represents and relates to what is now today the role of the average American woman.  A widow had the freedom to own property, which in effect gave her wealth which in every society around the world is equivalent to power, or at the very least, it betters ones social status.
  

Chapter 2: Goodwives and Bad: New England Women in the Seventeenth Century

 Hannah Emerson Duston

New England was characterized by a puritan culture, and once again, a man’s world that a woman just so happened to find herself living in. As for social status, a woman was fixed below her husband and above that of her children and her servants, and in no way would a woman’s life in New England be characterized by autonomous (Berkin, 27).  With that being said, it was common for the man’s world, that of business, and the women’s world, that of the home, to overlap. It was common for women to be present when debts were contracted and other business deals, with that being said, women gained much knowledge in relation to such tasks, and it would be of no surprise to state that women most likely had some type of affect/influence on their husbands decisions (Berkin, 30). In New England a family’s wealth consisted of land and livestock (Berkin, 29). 
During 17th century New England, “Very few white women placed themselves outside the limits of the patriarchal family”(Berkin, 27).  With that being said, New England women found that their housewifery consisted of marketplace exchanges and few productive enterprises as well. It became common for young puritan girls to marry before the age of twenty and by the 1650’s the marriage age of these young girls steeply dropped to below sixteen years of age (Berkin, 25).  As in the Chesapeake region, the ratio between the sexes was too, unbalanced, creating various consequences (Berkin, 25).  It would be interesting to research if whether the imbalance of men and women within these colonial societies led to a higher percentage of affairs with married women, because it would be safe to believe that there would be few single women by the time they were in their mid twenties, if any. 
New England, just as was the case in the Chesapeake region death came early for many, but in comparison, those who survived to adulthood actually lived longer than those in tobacco regions such as Chesapeake. And at least three percent and possibly even ten percent of women who became pregnant and gave birth between 1630 and 1670 died following the birth of their child. In fact it was not the first child/birth that posed the worst threat, but rather the many births that followed (Berkin, 26).  
During 17th century New England, “Very few white women placed themselves outside the limits of the patriarchal family”(Berkin, 27).  With that being said, New England women found that their housewifery consisted of marketplace exchanges and few productive enterprises as well. It became common for young puritan girls to marry before the age of twenty and by the 1650’s the marriage age of these young girls steeply dropped to below sixteen years of age (Berkin, 25).  As in the Chesapeake region, the ratio between the sexes was too, unbalanced, creating various consequences (Berkins, 25).  It would be interesting to research if whether the imbalance of men and women within these colonial societies led to a higher percentage of affairs with married women, because it would be safe to believe that there would be few single women by the time they were in their mid twenties, if any. 
Records of marital strife show evidence that men did indeed inflict various types of abuse on their wives in 17th century New England.  Such actions were defended on the stance of those in authority disciplining their subordinates. John Tillison chained his wife by the leg while he plowed in an attempt to not allow her leave the house, one man in Maine kicked his wife in the face because she refused to feed his pig, and Daniel Ela was literally caught beating his wife, his response to such actions was that his wife was his servant and his slave (Berkin, 31).  It is interesting that such acts were condoned, or at the very least tolerated in a Puritan culture, where God was put above all else, and morals were to not be compromised. “Puritanism was more than a theology and more than a theology and more than an institution; it was, as scholars have observed and documented from the seventeenth century onward, a way of life” (Berkin, 35). And the puritan way of life did not condone the outright preaching of women in the church, once again that position was withheld for a man (Berkin, 38).
Witchcraft, or the ‘witch hunts’ became a serious phenomena within New England society.  Those most susceptible to accusations were those who were suffering from a decline in social status, or those who were poor and needy. “Women accused of witchcraft were often at the age of menopause-poised, as the puritans understood it, between the preparatory stages of childhood and youth and the declining stage of old age” (Berkin, 47).  In 1692 the Salem witch hunts took place, many were accused of meddling in witchcraft, an offense obviously not taken lightly in a Puritan controlled society (Berkin, 48). By the summer of 1692 nineteen people were convicted and executed; most of these individuals were women who pleaded their innocence up until their death (Berkin, 49). 
In many ways New England was extremely different from that of the Chesapeake region, at least culturally, but in many ways the two are extremely similar, as would be the expected case with many other regions during colonial America at this time.


Opinion: From what I have read, it is my understanding that had I been given a chance to live in New England I most likely would have chosen not to do so.  For obvious reasons, the Salem witch hunt is by no means a matter to be taken lightly.  It is hard for me to believe that all 19 people convicted and executed were all in fact involved in witchcraft.  It appears to be just another example of a paranoid society taking matters way too far, and that is an extreme understatement. I found many similarities between New England and the Chesapeake, for instance mortality rates did not fare well for women, especially in relation to child birth, the sex ratio between the two genders, and the emphasis of a strict community built on the unwillingness to compromise the status of the male as essentially god on earth for these women. 


Chapter 3: The Sisters of Pocahontas: Native American Women in the Centuries of Colonization 
Wetamo

When Plymouth was settled and the English moved into the New England region they created treaties with local Native Americans. This was important to keep ties civil and to work together to live and flourish in the area. There was peace forged between the Wampanoag’s and the Plymouth plantation that allowed life to carry on nicely, but over the years times changed. Wetamo was born in time of peace for the two communities, she was in an aristocratic family and when she got to marriage age she married Wamsutta the son of Massasoit the leader of Wampanoag tribe. This made a lot of sense at the time because it unit two leading families between two communities. The problems start to occur with death of Massasoit and the changes that had occurred over the years with the English coming into the New World in great numbers and no longer needing help or resources from the natives. The massacre of Pequot was huge for the couple as they saw the dangers for Wampanoag. Plymouth colonists got angry as the couple when they heard that land in Rhode Island has been sold to others instead of them and so they took Wamsutta and he died (mysteriously). This started war between Plymouth and Wampanoag that Wetamo would lead. She would have a few victories for Native Americans but in the end she died and her head on a pole.
We can learn from the story of Wetamo and Wamsutta. Wetamo was a Native American queen for the Wampanoag tribe. She stood by her people and fought for revenge for her people who were being taken advantage of by the English. She did not give up like others in the tribe, including her second husband who was willing to just let the English win. Native American women could hold high positions in society when it called for it, like in case of Wetamo. On average however, women talked politics but did not enact them. Women held special place in tribe, because they were the care takers, food preparers, farmers, and would teach the girls trades as they grew up so that they would be useful to the tribe as adults.  
When the Europeans came into the New World they took everything from the Wampanoag tribe. At first they took their kindness and help to survive. Then they turned against them killing off their people, waging war and in the end only a few survivors remained; the question is would they even want to remain without their culture, people or land.
Opinion:
The story of Wampanoag tribe being so used and abused by the settlers of Plymouth does not surprise me at all. In the race to get land and power in a new world for the Europeans they took and took from the natives, not giving much in return and then once they did not need their help anymore they obliterated them just because they could. The native tribes were not really given opportunities to thrive and if the English did not kill them with guns then they killed them with disease. It is a sad injustice that plagued the Native Americans.
I do like to read about a women being the leader of the tribe. The book says that the English did not share the stories of Wetamo at first because it makes them look guilty of exterminating a Native American tribe. I am glad that the story has risen out of the shadows and is available to be heard now. I can only imagine how scary it would be to have people that you were at peace with and friendly with to turn on you in just 40 years after your people had helped them survive and were allies to them. Wetamo was a brave women who showed pride in her people and stands out with greats like Queen Elizabeth as a women in power who did all they could for their nation.

Chapter 4: In a "Babel of Confusion": Women in the Middle Colonies

Margaret Hardenbroeck 

The Middle Colonies were by far the most diverse in culture, religion, ethnicity and social class, in comparison with the other colonial regions (Berkin,102). In fact it appears that the Middle Colonies were at least somewhat embracing of the improvement of the social status and the establishment of standards for women, especially in terms of women entering the work force. Women began to establish jobs within the Middle Colonies, something less seen within the other regions of the colonial world. “In 1745 less than one-fifth of the city’s servants were women; by the end of the century, scarce or numerous, these women struggled on the margins of society” (Berkin,100).  Many servants went from job to job, due to abuse, conflict, or the fact that many of these jobs were considered temporary in the first place. The conditions for women servants were not optimal; they could be lectured, or just outright fired. Stability was by no means an appropriate representation of the work force for women, especially in relation to servant employment  (Berkin, 98). 
If there was one entity, or organization institution that somewhat allowed women a sense of individuality, or autonomy (only in a sense) it would have been the Quaker religion.  Such leaders preached equality for all men and women; this went against the already established social hierarchy of society (Berkin, 88). “The early Quakers earned a reputation as evangelicals, traveling across England, exhorting men and women to give up the sins and vanities of the world and listen to the voice of God within them.” (Berkin, 88).  In relation to the Quaker religion women could actually make an impact, and establish themselves socially. In fact, “for women whose life choices were in harmony with Quaker prescriptive, the opportunity for leadership and public recognition far exceeded those in the non-Quaker world.” (Berkin, 94).  Women were even capable and did become elders and ministers within the Quaker community. It is ironic that the one institution, notorious for suppressing women’s rights throughout the world and along the centuries, ‘the church’ was the one institution that embraced and opened up doors for women, somewhat, within the Middle Colonies.

Opinion: It appears that Middle Colonies quite actually resemble the America that we know and live in today.  A world where women are able to receive jobs for pay, a world where women are able to speak out within the church, even becoming ministers, which in actuality is still a heated topic debate (whether or not women should be allowed to take positions of spiritual authority within the church).  If I was a woman within the 17th century, and I had a choice between living in the Chesapeake region, New England, or the Middle Colonies, I would most certainly choose the Middle Colonies.  It was socially diverse, and appeared to have been more accepting of women in general, at least from the brief discussion provided by First Generations

Chapter 5: The Rhythms of Labor: African-American Women in Colonial Society


Africans were forced away from their homes in Africa, chained, branded and marched to the ships to be taken across the Atlantic Ocean in close quarters to one another on a ship. Women coming across may have been separated from their parents, siblings, husband, and children. The loneliness and sadness would have only gotten worse upon landing in the New World with the new culture, language, climate and the fact that they would be owned for most likely the rest of their lives forced to do heavy and tiring labor everyday all day.
Mary was no different as she was forced into slavery and ended up at Bennett’s tobacco plantation. She happened to have some luck in New World as she married Antonio/Anthony Johnson and be married for 40 years rising from slavery to freedom and having four children. They had land of their own, used the laws to protect their rights and lived relatively like a white family in the colony.
Opinion
I think it is amazing how the Johnson family being made up of a Creole man and an African women slave made their lives better by taking opportunities and chances to get freedom in the colony and ended up having lives like their white counter parts even having slaves themselves. They were so assimilated that Mary was treated like white wives and did not have to pay taxes.
                  I think that it would have been odd to come over to the new world as a slave and feeling alone and defeated by white masters who controlled me and then to overcome their chains and to be almost an equal to white counterparts. I think it is even more interesting that the Johnson’s owned slaves themselves and Anthony even took court action against a neighbor to get their slave back. After these first slaves in New World slave society gets so much worse and the African’s are treated so poorly. It would be weird to know that others had gained freedom and at least somewhat had a good life in the same position that the new slaves coming in were at, but they never enjoyed their own lands or freedoms like Mary.


Chapter 6:The Rise of Gentility: Class and Regional Differences in the Eighteenth Century

Eliza Lucas Pinckney

             This chapter was about the life of a prominent upper class woman named Eliza Lucas who was the daughter of a military officer in England. In her early life, her father was her full power of his plantation when he was called back to a military campaign.
Her being in this place of power was not out of economic necessity, like it would have for any other woman in her colony. Even though her father had the money to hire a housekeeper, but he turned everything over to Eliza at the bright young age of 16.
Eliza was a well educated young woman, who was unmarried.  And her father new this fact, and tried to marry his daughter off many times, but Eliza told her father she wasn’t ready to get married, and that she wanted to wait until she was ready. 

Opinion:   This just goes to show that even women in the 1700’s had some control over their lives, even if it wasn’t very, some still managed to put off marriage until they were ready themselves. I feel this is almost a stepping stone for women in this era, because even though Eliza was an only child, her father could have easily found a male to run his plantation rather than his only daughter. If I was in this era, I would have been honored to the head of my father’s plantation, rather than him just not trusting me with the duties of being the head of the family business. And having the ability to stand up to my father and say I’m not ready to settle down and have a husband and kids, until I was ready. For Eliza to do that and later in her life decide to pass on the family business in order to raise a family and only after the kids were all grown up and starting their lives did she go back into the family business in which her father had left her when she was a teenager.   


Chapter 7: "Beat of Drum and Ringing of Bell": Women in the American Revolution


             As for Grace Galloway her life during the Revolution, she thought her life was perfect. She had a husband and a happy and healthy daughter. Granted prior to her married life she was an “imperious and confident” woman, who worse than a canvas was not for the idea of preserving her image. It was said that a woman of her status knew her place among society. All though she was not a woman whose status was questioned ever, due to the fact her father’s great wealth and public service as a lawyer in their town. Then after she married, she become legally invisible, and her husband had all the power in the family, leaving her with very little. And when her husband’s colony was threatened by the crown of England, he fled with his daughter and left his wife behind.

Opinion:
I feel that during this era, women like Grace who comes from money and where often married off and often then became invisible to society after they were married and had kids of their own. And when their husband’s leave them, it is often said that the husband told her to stay behind and tend the family farm.